A Denmark-based man has been convicted of sharing nude segments from protected movies and TV series on the online site Reddit.
According to a law enforcement document obtained by media outlets, the unnamed man posted 347 clips of nude content in a subreddit he moderated, which were then watched 4.2 million-plus times.
Danish authorities confirm he has been handed a 7-month suspended sentence for copyright infringement.
Experts explain the man was prosecuted under a rarely-used clause in Denmark's intellectual property legislation, with the judge finding that by removing the footage out of their intended setting, the man had harmed the performers' "ethical entitlements".
He has additionally been found guilty of distributing more than 25 terabytes of protected data.
From March 2022 to mid-2023, the man using the alias "KlammereFyr" on Reddit posted adult clips featuring over 100 actresses.
He distributed them in the subreddit he was a administrator of.
Per the Denmark's copyright protection organization The Rights Alliance (TRA), his subreddit had more than 6,000 subscribers and users were encouraged to ask for clips of particular performers.
In last year, campaigners reported the case to the authorities on behalf of the affected artists, directors and production companies, which resulted in the subreddit being closed down.
Andrea Vagn Jensen, among the performers whose explicit content were circulated in the group, explained to Danish media at the time she felt there was a difference between being seen unclothed in a film and appearing on Reddit.
The performer said the uploads amounted to "exploitation".
The man was arrested in fall 2024 and admitted culpable to the allegations recently.
In a comment following the verdict, the head of the Rights Alliance Maria Fredenslund said the decision sent an "important" message "that infringements of creators' rights have consequences".
The ruling is viewed as unprecedented in Denmark for its use of the "ethical protections" section of the Danish Copyright Act, which specifies an artist's creation cannot be used in a way which violates their standing.
Intellectual property specialist Dr Alina Trapova told BBC News the legal matter was "unusual" for its focus on the harm to the dignity of an artist, rather than to them financially.
The extent to which the case could influence nations abroad is unclear.
But she said there may be "an increasing number of these actions" in the coming years with the advancement of artificial intelligence, where "the integrity of an individual's work might be compromised with greater ease".
A seasoned IT strategist with over 15 years of experience in digital transformation and enterprise software solutions.